Electrics for electric and hybrid drives, Inverters for electric drives, ボッシュ自動車handbook 11版(124)
人生で影響を受けた本100冊。
に掲載した本のうち、「新人プログラマ応援」企画で「私の推薦書３３冊」として３３冊紹介した。
新人プログラマ応援 私の推薦書３３冊
http://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/98c62f051dbdb4f8aca2
残りの６７冊から、順に過去の読書感想を引用し、新たな読書感想文を追記する。
<この項は書きかけです。順次追記します。>
ボッシュ自動車ハンドブック version 11, 2022
Automotive Handbook May 2, 2022
ボッシュ自動車handbook(英語)11版(0-1) 課題と記事一覧new
Contents
Motor vehicle, 28
Basic principles, 32
Mathematics and methods, 204
Materials, 258
Machine parts, 354
Joining and bonding techniques, 426
Vehicle physics, 462
Operating fluids, 538
Refrigerants for air-conditioning systems, 591
Drivetrain(駆動系), 594
Internal-combustion engines(内燃機関),642
Management for spark-ignition engines,800
Gasoline-engine operation with alternative fuels, 886
Management for diesel engines, 906
Electrification of the drive, 970
Emission-control and diagnosis legislation, 1042
Chassis systems, 1108
Vehicle bodies, 1310
Comfort and convenience, 1392
Safety systems in the motor vehicle, 1410
Vehicle security systems, 1430
Automotive electrics, 1450
Vehicle electrical systems for hybrid and electric vehicles, 1560
Automotive electronics, 1620
Entertainment 1780
Drive assistance and sensors, 1804
Drive assistance systems 1872
Future of automated driving 1934
Appendics, 1940
Inverters for electric drives, p.1582
Area of application
Function and circuitry
Activation and control
Software and functional safety
Equiptment mechanics
Reference
[1] ISO 21212:2008
Intelligent transport systems — Communications access for land mobiles (CALM) — 2G Cellular systems
3 Normative references
ISO 21210, Intelligent transport systems — Communications access for land mobiles (CALM) — Networking Protocols
ISO 21217, Intelligent transport systems — Communications access for land mobiles (CALM) — Architecture
ISO 21218, Intelligent transport systems — Communications access for land mobiles (CALM) — Medium service access points
ISO 24102, CALM Management
ISO 25111, CALM using Public Networks — General requirements
ANSI/TIA-136-A, Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular Systems
ARIB RCR STD-27, Personal Digital Cellular (PDC) Telecommunication System (Fascicle 1)
TIA/EIA/IS-54-C, Cellular System Dual-Mode Mobile Station–Base Station Compatibility Standard
TIA-95-B, Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular Systems
3GPP/3GPP2, 3GPP/3GPP2 Standards as they relate to 2G/2.5G
4 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 21217 apply.
[2] ISO 26262
ISO 26262-1:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 1: Vocabulary
Only informative sections of standards are publicly available. To view the full content, you will need to purchase the standard by clicking on the "Buy" button.
Bibliography
[1] ISO 3779, Road vehicles — Vehicle identification number (VIN) — Content and structure
[2] IATF 16949, Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service parts organizations
[3] ISO 26262-2:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 2: Management of functional safety
[4] ISO 26262-3:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 3: Concept phase
[5] ISO 26262-4:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 4: Product development at the system level
[6] ISO 26262-5:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 5: Product development at the hardware level
[7] ISO 26262-6:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 6: Product development at the software level
[8] ISO 26262-7:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 7: Production, operation, service and decommissioning
[9] ISO 26262-8:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 8: Supporting processes
[10] ISO 26262-9:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 9: Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL)-oriented and safety-oriented analyses
[11] ISO 26262-10:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 10: Guideline on ISO 26262
[12] ISO 26262-11:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 11: Guideline on application of ISO 26262 to semiconductors
[13] ISO 26262-12:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 12: Adaptation of ISO 26262 for motorcycles
[14] IEC 61508 (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[15] ECE/TRANS/WP .29/78/Rev.3+Amend.1 (Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3))
[16] TRANS/WP. 29/1045+Amend.1&2
[17] SAE J1211, Physics of Failure methodology
[18] ISO 3833, Road vehicles — Types — Terms and definitions
[19] ISO 9000:2015, Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary
ISO 26262-2:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 2: Management of functional safety
Bibliography
[1] ISO 26262-10, Guidelines on ISO 26262
[2] ISO 26262-12, Adaptation of ISO 26262 for motorcycles
[3] ISO 9001, Quality management systems — Requirements
[4] IATF 16949, Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service parts organizations
[5] ISO/IEC 33000 (all parts), Information technology — Process assessment
[6] IEC 61508 (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[7] ISO/IEC 27001, Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Requirements
[8] ISO/IEC 15408 (all parts), Information technology — Security techniques — Evaluation criteria for IT security
[9] SAE J3061, Cybersecurity Guidebook for Cyber-Physical vehicle Systems
[10] No S.S., 75-INSAG-4, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1991
[11] United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive, Managing competence for safety-related systems, 2007
[12] Automotive SPICE [viewed 2017-10-11]. Available at:
http://www.automotivespice.com
[13] CMMI for Development [viewed 2017-10-11]. Available at:
http://www.cmmiinstitute.com/resources
ISO 26262-3:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 3: Concept phase
Bibliography
[1] ISO 26262-12:2018, Road Vehicles — Functional Safety — Part 12: Adaptation of ISO 26262 for motorcycles
[2] IEC 61508 (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[3] Abbreviated injury scale; Association of the advancement of Automotive medicine; Barrington, IL, USA Information is also available at www.aaam.org
[4] Code of Practice for the design and evaluation of ADAS, EU Project RESPONSE 3: Oct. 2006; https://www.acea.be/publications/article/code-of-practice-for-the-design-and-evaluation-of-adas
[5] Baker S.P., O’Neill, B., Haddon, W., Long, W.B., The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1974
[6] Balogh Z., Offner P.J., Moore E.E., Biffl W.L., NISS predicts post injury multiple organ failure better than ISS, The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2000
ISO 26262-4:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 4: Product development at the system level
Bibliography
[1] ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, Systems and software engineering — System life cycle processes
[2] ISO/IEC/IEEE 16326, Systems and software engineering — Life cycle processes — Project management
[3] ISO 26262-11:2018, Road Vehicles — Functional safety — Part 11: Guideline on application of ISO 26262 on semiconductors
[4] ISO 11451 (all parts), Road vehicles — Vehicle test methods for electrical disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic energy
[5] ISO 11452 (all parts), Road vehicles — Component test methods for electrical disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic energy
[6] ISO 7637 (all parts), Road vehicles — Electrical disturbances from conduction and coupling
[7] ISO 10605, Road vehicles — Test methods for electrical disturbances from electrostatic discharge
[8] ISO 26262-12:2018, Road Vehicles — Functional safety — Part 12: Adaptation of ISO 26262 for Motorcycles
ISO 26262-5:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 5: Product development at the hardware level
Bibliography
[1] ISO 7637-2, Road vehicles — Electrical disturbances from conduction and coupling — Part 2: Electrical transient conduction along supply lines only
[2] ISO 7637-3, Road vehicles — Electrical disturbances from conduction and coupling — Part 3: Electrical transient transmission by capacitive and inductive coupling via lines other than supply lines
[3] ISO 10605, Road vehicles — Test methods for electrical disturbances from electrostatic discharge
[4] ISO 11452-2, Road vehicles — Component test methods for electrical disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic energy — Part 2: Absorber-lined shielded enclosure
[5] ISO 11452-4, Road vehicles — Component test methods for electrical disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic energy — Part 4: Harness excitation methods
[6] ISO 16750-2, Road vehicles — Environmental conditions and testing for electrical and electronic equipment — Part 2: Electrical loads
[7] ISO 16750-4, Road vehicles — Environmental conditions and testing for electrical and electronic equipment — Part 4: Climatic loads
[8] ISO 16750-5, Road vehicles — Environmental conditions and testing for electrical and electronic equipment — Part 5: Chemical loads
[9] IEC 61508 (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[10] IEC 61709, Electronic components — Reliability — Reference conditions for failure rates and stress models for conversion
[11] SN 29500 (2004), Siemens AG, Failure Rates of Components — Expected Values, General
[12] Intentionally left blank
[13] EN 50129:2003, Railway applications — Communication, signalling and processing systems — Safety related electronic systems for signalling
[14] MIL HDBK 217 F notice 2, Military handbook: Reliability prediction of electronic equipment
[15] MIL HDBK 338, Military handbook: Electronic reliability design handbook
[16] NPRD-2016, Non-electronic Parts Reliability Data
[17] RIAC FMD-2016, Failure Mode / Mechanism Distributions
[18] RIAC HDBK 217 Plus, Reliability Prediction Models
[19] UTE C80-811, Reliability methodology for electronic systems
[20] BIROLINI, A., Reliability Engineering, Theory and Practice, 2014
[21] Sundaram P., D’Ambrosio J.G., Controller Integrity in Automotive Failsafe System Architectures, SAE 2006 World Congress, 2006-01-0840
[22] Fruehling T., Delphi Secured Microcontroller Architecture S.A.E., 2000 World Congress, SAE# 2000‑01‑1052
[23] Mahmood A., McCluskey E.J., “Concurrent Error Detection Using Watchdog Processors – A Survey”, IEEE Trans. Computers, 37(2), 160-174 (1988)
[24] Leaphart E., Czerny B., D’Ambrosio J. et al., Survey of Software Failsafe Techniques for Safety-Critical Automotive Applications, SAE 2005 World Congress, 2005-01-0779
[25] Mariani R., Fuhrmann P., Vittorelli B., Cost-effective Approach to Error Detection for an Embedded Automotive Platform, 2006-01-0837, SAE 2006 World Congress & Exhibition, April 2006, Detroit, MI, USA
[26] Patel J., Fung L., “Concurrent Error Detection in ALU's by Recomputing with Shifted Operands”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. C-31, pp.417-422, July 1982
[27] Forin P., Vital Coded Microprocessor: Principles and Application for various Transit Systems, Proc. IFAC-GCCT, Paris, France, 1989
[28] Ramabadran T.V., Gaitonde S.S., 1988), “A tutorial on CRC computations”. IEEE Micro 8 (4): 62–75, 1988
[29] Koopman P., Chakravarty T., 2004), Cyclic Redundancy Code (CRC) Polynomial Selection For Embedded Networks The International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, DSN-2004, http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/roses/dsn04/koopman04_crc_poly_embedded.pdf
[30] FIDES guide 2009 edition A (September 2010), Reliability Methodology for Electronic Systems
ISO 26262-6:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 6: Product development at the software level
Bibliography
[1] ISO/IEC 12207:2008, Systems and software engineering — Software life cycle processes
[2] IEC 61508:2010, (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[3] MISRA C:2012, Guidelines for the use of the C language in critical systems, ISBN 978-1-906400-10-1, MIRA, March 2013
[4] MISRA AC GMG, Generic modelling design and style guidelines, ISBN 978-906400-06-4, MIRA, May 2009
[5] ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119:2013, (all parts), Software and systems engineering — Software testing
[6] Bieman J.M., Dreilinger D., Lin L., “Using fault injection to increase software test coverage,” in Software Reliability Engineering, 1996. Proceedings., Seventh International Symposium on, vol., no., pp.166-174, 30 Oct-2 Nov 1996 doi: 10.1109/ISSRE.1996.558776
[7] Jia Y., Merayo M., Harman M., 2015) Introduction to the special issue on Mutation Testing. Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab., 25: 461–463
[8] ISO 26262-12:2018, Road Vehicles — Functional safety — Part 12: Adaptation of ISO 26262 for Motorcycles
ISO 26262-7:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 7: Production, operation, service and decommissioning
Bibliography
[1] IEC 61508 (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[2] ISO 26262-6:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 6: Product development at the software level
[3] ISO 26262-10:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 10: Guideline on ISO 26262
[4] ISO 26262-11:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 11: Guideline on application of ISO 26262 to semiconductors
[5] ISO 26262-12:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 12: Adaptation of ISO 26262 for motorcycles
[6] IATF 16949, Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service parts organizations
ISO 26262-8:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 8: Supporting processes
Bibliography
[1] ISO 26262-11:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 11: Guideline on application of ISO 26262 to semiconductors
[2] ISO 26262-12:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 12: Adaptation of ISO 26262 for motorcycles
[3] ISO 9001, Quality management systems — Requirements
[4] ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, Systems and software engineering — System life cycle processes
[5] ISO 16750 (all parts), Road vehicles — Environmental conditions and testing for electrical and electronic equipment
[6] IATF 16949, Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service parts organizations
[7] ISO 25119 (all parts), Tractors and machinery for agriculture and forestry — Safety-related parts of control systems
[8] ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148, Systems and software engineering — Life cycle processes — Requirements engineering
[9] ISO 13849 (all parts), Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of control systems
[10] IEC 61508 (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[11] RTCA DO-178C, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification
[12] CMMI for Development, CMMI-DEV, Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute,
[13] German V-Model - Available at: http://www.v-modell-xt.de/[viewed 2018-09-27]
[14] AEC Q100, Failure Mechanism Based Stress Test Qualification For Integrated Circuits
[15] AEC Q101, Failure Mechanism Based Stress Test Qualification For Discrete Semiconductors
[16] AEC Q200, Stress Test Qualification For Passive Components
[17] Automotive SPICE®4 - Available at: http://www.automotivespice.com [viewed 2018-09-27]
[18] ISO 10007, Quality management — Guidelines for configuration management
[19] ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207, Systems and software engineering — Software life cycle processes
[20] ISO/IEC 33000 (series), Information Technology — Process Assessment
ISO 26262-9:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 9: Automotive safety integrity level (ASIL)-oriented and safety-oriented analyses
Bibliography
[1] IEC 61508 (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[2] Lovric T., (ZF TRW), Metz P. (Brose), Schnellbach A. (Magna), Dependent Failure Analysis in Practice, VDA Sys Conference, July 6th–8th 2016, Berlin
[3] Schnellbach, Magna Powertrain, Dependent Failure Analysis, The MPT approach, Safetronic. 2014 — Functional Safety in Automotive conference, 11th–12th Nov, 2014, Stuttgart
[4] ISO 26262-11:2018, Road vehicles - Functional safety - Part 11: Guidelines on application of ISO 26262 to semiconductors
[5] ISO 26262-12:2018, Road vehicles - Functional safety - Part 12: Adaptation for motorcycles
ISO 26262-10:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 10: Guidelines on ISO 26262
Bibliography
[1] IEC 61508 (all parts), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[2] GSN COMMUNITY STANDARD VERSION 1, November 2011
[3] JEDEC – JEP131A (May 2005), Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
[4] SAE-J1739_200901, Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (Design FMEA) and Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA) and Effects Analysis for Machinery (Machinery FMEA)
[5] IEC 61025, ed. 2.0 — Procedures and Symbols for FTA
[6] SAE J2980, Considerations for ISO 26262 ASIL Hazard Classification
[7] ISO 26262-2:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 2: Management of Functional Safety
[8] ISO 26262-3:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 3: Concept phase
[9] ISO 26262-4:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 4: Product development at the system level
[10] ISO 26262-5:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 5: Product development at the hardware level
[11] ISO 26262-6:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 6: Product development at the software level
[12] ISO 26262-7:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 7: Production, operation, service and decommissioning
[13] ISO 26262-8:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 8: Supporting processes
[14] ISO 26262-9:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 9: Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) oriented and safety-oriented analyses
[15] ISO 26262-11:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 11: Guideline on application of ISO 26262 to semiconductors
[16] ISO 26262-12:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 12: Adaptation of ISO 26262 for motorcycles
[17] Convention on Road Traffic, Done at Vienna on 8 November 1968 including amendment 1, Economic Commission for Europe, Inland Transportation Committee, [viewed 2018-09-25] Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/conventn/crt1968e.pdf
ISO 26262-11:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 11: Guidelines on application of ISO 26262 to semiconductors
Bibliography
[1] Askari S., Nourani M. Design methodology for mitigating transient errors in analogue and mixed-signal circuits. Circuits, Devices & Systems [online]. IET. November 2012, 6(6), 447-456 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1049/iet-cds.2012.0053
[2] Baumann R.C. Radiation-Induced Soft Errors in Advanced Semiconductor Technologies. IEEE Transactions on device and materials reliability [online]. IEEE. December 2005, 5(3), 305-316 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/TDMR.2005.853449
[3] Baruah S.K., Goossens J. Rate-monotonic scheduling on uniform multiprocessors. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems [online]. IEEE. May 2003, 360-366 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/ICDCS.2003.1203485
[4] Börcsök J., Schaefer S., Ugljesa E. Estimation and Evaluation of Common Cause Failures. Second International Conference on Systems [online]. IEEE. April 2007, 41 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/ICONS.2007.25
[5] Bressoud T.C., Schneider F.B. Hypervisor-based fault tolerance. Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles [online]. ACM. December 1995, 1–11 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1145/224057.224058
[6] Chattopadhyay S., Kee C.L., Roychoudhury A., Kelter T., Marwedel P., Falk H. A Unified WCET Analysis Framework for Multi-core Platforms. IEEE 18th Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium [online]. IEEE. April 2012, 99-108 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/RTAS.2012.26
[7] Clegg J.R. Arguing the safety of FPGAs within safety critical systems. Incorporating the SaRS Annual Conference, 4th IET International Conference on Systems Safety [online]. IET. October 2009, 1-6 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1049/cp.2009.1569
[8] Conmy P.M., Pygott C., Bate I. VHDL guidance for safe and certifiable FPGA design. 5th IET International Conference on System Safety [online]. IET. October 2010, 1-6 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1049/cp.2010.0832
[9] FIDES Guide 2009 Edition A September 2010, Reliability Methodology for Electronic Systems
[10] Fleming, P.R., Olson, B.D., Holman, W.T., Bhuva, B.L., Massengill, L.W. Design Technique for Mitigation of Soft Errors in Differential Switched-Capacitor Circuits. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs [online]. IEEE. May 2008, 55(9), 838-842 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/TCSII.2008.923437
[11] Franklin M. Incorporating Fault Tolerance in Superscalar Processors. Proceedings of International Conference on High Performance Computing [online]. IEEE. December 1996 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/HIPC.1996.565839
[12] Hayek A., Borcsok J. SRAM-based FPGA design techniques for safety-related systems conforming to IEC 61508 a survey and analysis. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computational Tools for Engineering Applications (ACTEA) [online]. IEEE. December 2012, 319-324 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/ICTEA.2012.6462892
[13] Heiser G. The role of virtualization in embedded systems. Proceedings of the 1st workshop on Isolation and integration in embedded systems [online]. ACM. April 2008, 11-16 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1145/1435458.1435461
[14] IEC 61508‑2:2010, Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems
[15] IEC 61709:2017, Electrical components — Reliability — Reference conditions for failure rates and stress models for conversion
[16] JEDEC JEP122H, Failure Mechanisms and Models for Semiconductor Devices
[17] JEDEC JESD89A, Measurement and Reporting of Alpha Particle and Terrestrial Cosmic Ray-Induced Soft Errors in Semiconductor Devices
[18] Keckler, S.W., Olukotun, K., Hofstee, H.P. Multicore Processors and Systems. 2009. Springer
[19] Kervarreca, G., et al. A universal field failure based reliability prediction model for SMD Integrated Circuits. Microelectronics Reliability [online]. Elsevier. June-July 1999, 765-771 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(99)00099-2
[20] Lazzari C. ET AL. Phase-Locked Loop Automatic Layout Generation and Transient Fault Injection Analysis: A Case Study. 12th IEEE International On-Line Testing workshop [online]. IEEE. July 2006, 117-127 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/IOLTS.2006.48
[21] Benso A., Bosio A., Di Carlo S., Mariani R. A Functional Verification based Fault Injection Environment. 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault-Tolerance in VLSI Systems [online]. IEEE. September 2007 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/DFT.2007.31
[22] Mariani R. Soft Errors on Digital Components. Fault Injection Techniques and Tools for Embedded Systems Reliability Evaluation [online]. Springer. 2003 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48711-X_3
[23] MIL-HDBK-217, Military Handbook — Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment
[24] Mitra, S., Saxena, N.R., Mccluskey, E.J. Common-mode failures in redundant VLSI systems: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Reliability [online]. IEEE. September 2000, 49(3), 285-295 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/24.914545
[25] Mukherjee S.S. ET AL. A systematic methodology to compute the architectural vulnerability factors for a high-performance microprocessor in microarchitecture. Proceedings. 36th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture [online]. IEEE. December 2003, 29-40 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/MICRO.2003.1253181
[26] Niimi Y. ET AL. Virtualization Technology and Using Virtual CPU in the Context of ISO 26262: The E-Gas Case Study. SAE Technical Paper [online]. SAE. April 2013 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0196
[27] Paolieri M., Mariani R. Towards functional-safe timing-dependable real-time architectures. IEEE 17th International On-Line Testing Symposium (IOLTS) [online]. IEEE. July 2011, 31-36 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/IOLTS.2011.5993807
[28] Singh M. ET AL. Transient Fault Sensitivity Analysis of Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs). Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on VLSI (WVLSI '01) [online]. IEEE. April 2001 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/IWV.2001.923153
[29] White M., Bernstein J.B. Microelectronics Reliability: Physics-of-Failure Based Modeling and Lifetime Evaluation. JPL Publication [online]. February 2008 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: http://www.acceleratedreliabilitysolutions.com/images/_NASA_Physics_of_Failure_for_Microelectronics.pdf
[30] Arlat J., et al. Fault Injection and Dependability Evaluation of Fault-Tolerant Systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers [online]. IEEE. August 1993, 42(8), 913 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/12.238482
[31] Benso A. and Prinetto P. Fault Injection Techniques and Tools for Embedded Systems Reliability Evaluation. Springer. 2003 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48711-X_3
[32] Wei Jiesheng, et al. Quantifying the accuracy of high-level fault injection techniques for hardware faults. Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), 2014 44th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference [online]. IEEE. June 2014 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/DSN.2014.2
[33] Kejun Wu, Pahlevanzadeh H., Peng Liu, Qiaoyan Yu. A new fault injection method for evaluation of combining SEU and SET effects on circuit reliability. Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on [online]. IEEE. June 2014, 602,605 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/ISCAS.2014.6865207
[34] Van De Goor A.J. Testing Semiconductor Memories, Theory and Practice, 2nd. ComTex Publishing
[35] Enamul Amyeen M., et al. Evaluation of the Quality of N-Detect Scan ATPG Patterns on a Processor. Proceedings of the International Test Conference 2004, ITC'04 [online]. IEEE. October 2004, 669-678 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/TEST.2004.1387328
[36] Benware B., et al. Impact of Multiple-Detect Test Patterns on Product Quality, Proc. of the International Test Conference 2003, ITC'03 [online]. IEEE. October 2003, 1031-1040 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/TEST.2003.1271091
[37] Patel J.H. Stuck-At Fault: A Fault Model for the Next Millennium? Proceedings of the International Test Conference 1998, ITC'98 [online]. IEEE. August 1988, 1166 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/TEST.1998.743358
[38] SN 29500:2004, Siemens AG, "Failure Rates of Components — Expected Values, General"
[39] Paschalis A., and Gizopoulos D. Effective Software-Based Self-Test Strategies for On-Line Periodic Testing of Embedded Processors. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems [online]. IEEE. December 2004, 88-99[viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/TCAD.2004.839486
[40] IEC/TR 62380:2004, Reliability data handbook — Universal model for reliability prediction of electronics components, PCBs and equipment
[41] ITRS 2009, The International Technology Roadmap For Semiconductors (ITRS), 2009 Edition
[42] IEEE STD 2700-2014, IEEE Standard for Sensor Performance Parameter Definitions
[43] White Richard M. A Sensor Classification Scheme. IEEE Transactions On Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, And Frequency Control [online]. IEEE. March 1987, 34(2), 124-126 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/T-UFFC.1987.26922
[44] Gupta Vijay, R. Snow, M.C. Wu, A. Jain, J. Tsai. Recovery of Stiction-Failed MEMS Structures Using Laser-Induced Stress Waves. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems [online]. IEEE. August 2004, 13(4), 696-700 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/JMEMS.2004.832185
[45] Walraven Jeremy A. Failure Mechanisms in MEMS. IEEE ITC International Test Conference [online]. IEEE. October 2003, 828-833 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/TEST.2003.1270915
[46] J. Iannacci. Reliability of MEMS: A perspective on failure mechanisms, improvement solutions and best practices at development level. Elsevier Displays [online]. Elsevier. April 2015, 37, 62-71 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2014.08.003
[47] Vonkyoung Kim, Chen T. Assessing SRAM test coverage for sub-micron CMOS technologies. VLSI Test Symposium, 1997, 15th IEEE [online]. IEEE. May 1997, 24-30 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/VTEST.1997.599437
[48] Ginez O. ET AL. An overview of failure mechanisms in embedded flash memories. VLSI Test Symposium, 2006. Proceedings. 24th [online]. IEEE. April 2006 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/VTS.2006.19
[49] Di Carlo S., Fabiano M. PIAZZA, ROBERTO; PRINETTO, P. Exploring modeling and testing of NAND flash memories. Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS), 2010 East-West [online]. IEEE. September 2010, 47-50 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/EWDTS.2010.5742059
[50] Al-Ars, Z.; Hamdioui, S.; Van De Goor, A.J., Space of DRAM Fault Models and Corresponding Testing. Design, Automation and Test in Europe, 2006. DATE '06. IEEE. March 2006, 1, 1-6 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/DATE.2006.244080
[51] IATF 16949:2016, Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service parts organizations
[52] Daniel J. Sorin, Mark D. Hill, David A. Wood. A Primer on Memory Consistency and Cache Coherence (1st ed.). Morgan & Claypool Publishers
[53] JEDEC JESD94, Application Specific Qualification Using Knowledge Based Test Methodolog.
[54] G. Kervarrec, et al. A universal reliability prediction model for SMD integrated circuits based on field failures. European Symposium on Reliability of Electron Devices, Failure Physics and Analysis [online]. Microelectronics Reliability Elsevier. July 1999, 39(6), 765-771 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(99)00099-2
[55] E-GAS. Standardized E-GAS Monitoring Concept for Gasoline and Diesel Engine Control Units. [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: https://www.iav.com/sites/default/files/attachments/seite//ak-egas-v6-0-en-150922.pdf
[56] IEEE P1804, IEEE Draft Standard for Fault Accounting and Coverage Reporting to Digital Modules [viewed 2017-10-10]
[57] R. Leveugle, A. Calvez, P. Maistri and P. Vanhauwaert, Statistical fault injection: Quantified error and confidence. 2009 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition [online]. IEEE. April 2009, 502-506 [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: 10.1109/DATE.2009.5090716
[58] Philip Mayfield. Understanding Binomial Confidence Intervals [viewed 2017-10-10]. Available at: http://www.sigmazone.com/binomial_confidence_interval.htm
[59] SAE J1211:201211, Handbook for Robustness Validation of Automotive Electrical/Electronic Modules, SAE
[60] JEDEC JESD88E, Dictionary of Terms for Solid-State Technology — 6th Edition
[61] ISO 26262‑10:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 10: Guideline on ISO 26262
[62] AEC, AEC-Q100: Failure Mechanism Based Stress Test Qualification For Integrated Circuits
[63] ISO 26262‑2:2018, Road Vehicles — Functional Safety — Part 2: Management of functional safety
[64] ISO 26262‑3:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 3: Concept phase
[65] ISO 26262‑4:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 4: Product development at the system level
[66] ISO 26262‑5:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 5: Product development at the hardware level
[67] ISO 26262‑6:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 6: Product development at the software level
[68] ISO 26262‑7:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 7: Production, operation, service and decommissioning
[69] ISO 26262‑8:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 8: Supporting processes
[70] ISO 26262‑9:2018, Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 9: Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL)-oriented and safety-oriented analyses
ISO 26262-12:2018
Road vehicles — Functional safety — Part 12: Adaptation of ISO 26262 for motorcycles
Bibliography
[1] Abbreviated injury scale; Association of the advancement of Automotive medicine; Barrington, IL, USA Information is also available at www.aaam.org [viewed 2018-12-11]
[2] Baker S.P., O'Neill B., Haddon W., Long W.B., The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care, The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1974
[3] Balogh Z., Offner P.J., Moore E.E., Biffl W.L., NISS predicts post injury multiple organ failure better than ISS, The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2000
[4] ISO 11451 (all parts), Road vehicles — Vehicle test methods for electrical disturbances from narrowband radiated electromagnetic energy
[5] IEC 61000-6-1, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Part 6-1: Generic standards — Immunity for residential, commercial and light-industrial environments
[3] https://www.autotec.ch/technik/pdf/ms_E-GAS_Ueberwachung.pdf
Standardisiertes E-Gas Überwachungskonzept für Benzin und Diesel Motorsteuerungen Version 5.5
自己参考資料(self reference)
ボッシュ自動車ハンドブック
https://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/8e330ce57880f04d71d9
ボッシュ自動車handbook(英語)10版 目次
自動車工学とBosch Vehicle Handbook
＜この記事は個人の過去の経験に基づく個人の感想です。現在所属する組織、業務とは関係がありません。＞
文書履歴(document history)
ver. 0.01 初稿 20221111