LoginSignup
2
1

More than 1 year has passed since last update.

AUTOSAR CountdownAdvent Calendar 2022Day 14
@kaizen_nagoya(Dr. Kiyoshi Ogawa)

HAZOP資料整理

Last updated at Posted at 2020-03-13

1

Hazardous Industry Planning Advisory Paper No 8　HAZOP Guidelines, State of New South Wale, 　January 2011
https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Policy-and-Legislation/~/media/C9CC2DA7E9B947C78C7C1355AD5B4B15.ashx

References

American Institute of Chemical Engineers (1985), "Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures". 1985.
41+DaZeieLL.SX383_BO1,204,203,200.jpg
https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/0471978159

Andow, P., Guidance on HAZOP procedures for computer-controlled plants. UK Health and Safety Executive Contract Research Report No. 26/1991.

Bullock, B.C. The development application of quantitative risk criteria for chemical processes. Fifth Chemical Process Hazard Symposium, I. Chem E., Manchester, April 1974.

Chemical Industry Safety and Health Council of the Chemical Industries Association Ltd. A guide to Hazard and Operability Studies. 1977

Dicken, A.N.A., The quantitative assessment of chlorine emission hazards, Chlorine Bicentennial Symposium 1974 (New York Chlorine Institute).

Farmer, R.R., I. Chem E. Symposium Series No. 34, Major Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1971, p. 82.

Gibson, S. B., "Reliability Engineering Applied to the Safety of New Projects", Chem. Engr., London, 306, 105 (1974).

Hazard Analysis Course Notes, ICI Engineering (Australia).

Health and Safety Executive, "Programmable System in Safety Related Applications", HSE, HMSO, London, 1987.

Kletz, T. A., "Specifying and Designing Protective System". Loss Prevention, 6, 15 (1972).

Kletz, T. A. (1986), "Hazop and Hazan", Institution of Chemical Engineers (UK).

Knowlton, R.E., "An Introduction to Hazard and Operability Studies — A Guide Word Approach",
Chemetics International Ltd., 1981.

Lake, I. (1990) "HAZOP of Computer Based Systems", ICI Engineering (Australia). Lawley, H. G., Operability Studies and Hazard Analysis, Chem. Eng. Prog., April 1974.

Lees, F.P. (1996), "Loss Prevention in the Process Industries" Vol 1, 2 and 3, Butterworths.

Pitblado, R. M., Bellany, L. and Geyer, T., "Safety Assessment of Computer Controlled Process Plants", Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, EFCE Intern. Symp, Oslo, 1989.

Standards Australia – AS 61508 – Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems.

2

REVIEW OF HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES
HSL/2005/58
https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/hsl_pdf/2005/hsl0558.pdf

11 REFERENCES

  1. Agerwala 1979, PUTTING PETRI NETS TO WORK, T.Agerwala, Computer, v12, n12, p85-94, 1979.
  2. Andow 1991, GUIDANCE ON HAZOP PROCEDURES FOR COMPUTER - CONTROLLED PLANTS, HSE contract research report No. 26/1991, P.Andow, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1991.
  3. Balemans 1974, CHECK-LIST. GUIDE LINES FOR SAFE DESIGN OF PROCESS PLANTS, A.W.M.Balemans, 1st International Loss Prevention Symposium, p7-33, 1974.
  4. BSEN1050 1997, SAFETY OF MACHINERY - PRINCIPLES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT, BS EN 1050 : 1997.
  5. BS5760:2 1992, GUIDE TO THE ASSESSMENT OF RELIABILITY, BS 5760 : Part 2 : 1992.
  6. BS5760:5 1992, GUIDE TO FAILURE MODES, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS (FMEA AND FMECA), BS 5760 : Part 5 : 1992.
  7. BS5760:7 1992, GUIDE TO FAULT TREE ANALYSIS, BS 5760 : Part 7 : 1992.
  8. BS5760:9 1992, RELIABILITY OF SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS. PART 9. GUIDE TO THE BLOCK DIAGRAM TECHNIQUE, BS 5760 : Part 9 : 1992.
  9. CCPS 1992, GUIDELINES FOR HAZARD EV ALUA TION PROCEDURES, SECOND EDITION, Centre for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1992.
  10. Chastain 1997, CONDUCT BETTER MAINTENANCE AND OPERABILITY STUDIES, J.W.Chastain, J.H.S.Jenson, Chemical Engineering Progress, v93, p2, p49- 53, 1997.
  11. CIA 1970, SAFE AND SOUND, British Chemical Industry Safety Council of the Chemical Industries Association Limited, 1970.
  12. CIA 1977, SAFETY AUDITS. A GUIDE FOR THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, The Chemical Industry Safety and Health Council of the Chemical Industries Association, 1977.
  13. CIA 1993, A GUIDE TO HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDIES, Chemical Industries Association, 1993.
    HEALTH AND SAFETY LABORATORY An agency of the Health and Safety Executive
    46
  14. Clark 1997, APPLY THESE MATRICES TO HELP ENSURE PLANT SAFETY, D.G.Clark, Chemical Engineering Progress, v93, n12, p69-73, 1997.
  15. COMAH 1999, A GUIDE TO THE CONTROL OF MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS REGULATIONS, L111 HSE Books, 1999.
  16. Dougherty 1988, HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS. A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING APPROACH WITH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT APPLICATIONS, E.M.Dougherty.Jr., J.R.Fragola, John Wiley & Sons, 1988.
  17. Dhillon 1986, HUMAN RELIABILITY WITH HUMAN FACTORS, B.S.Dhillon, Pergamon Press, 1986.
  18. Eades 1998, APPROACHES TO HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, M.Eades, Health and Safety Executive (OTO 97 068), 1998.
  19. Elliott 1968, CRITICAL EXAMINATION IN PROCESS DESIGN, D.M.Elliott, J.M.Owens, The Chemical Engineer, p377-383, Nov. 1968.
  20. Fairley 1985, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONCEPTS, R.E.Fairley, McGraw- Hill, 1985.
  21. Greenberg 1992, RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT FOR THE CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRY, H.R.Greenberg, J.J.Cramer, Van Nostrum Reinhold, 1992.
  22. Hawksley 1987, RISK ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, J.L.Hawksley, The Safety Practitioner, v5, n10, p10-16, 1987.
  23. Kirwan 1992, A GUIDE TO TASK ANALYSIS, B.Kirwan, L.K.Ainsworth. (Ed.), Taylor&Francis Ltd. 1992.
  24. Kletz 1995, COMPUTER CONTROL AND HUMAN ERROR, T.Kletz, et.al., Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1995.
  25. Lear 1993, COMPUTER HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDIES, J.Lear, Safety and Reliability of Process Control Systems Symposium, Sydney University Chemical Engineering Association, 6th Oct. 1993.
  26. Lees 1996, LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, VOLUME 1, F.P.Lees, Butterworth & Co. Ltd., 1996
  27. Miller 1971, MANAGEMENT TOOLS IN LOSS PREVENTION, R.L.Miller, W.B.Howard, Major Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, The Institute of Chemical Engineers I.Chem.E Symposium Series No. 34, p203-209, 1971.
  28. Nielson 1975, CAUSE-CONSEQUENCE DIAGRAMS, D.S.Nielson, Nordic Working Group on Reactor Safety, 1975.
  29. Ozag 1987, HAZARD IDENTIFICA TION AND QUANTIFICA TION, H.Ozag, L.M.Bendixen, Chemical Engineering Progress, v83, n4, p55-64, 1987.
  30. Parry 1986, A REVIEW OF HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES AND THEIR APPLICATION TO MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS, S.T.Parry, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (SRD R379), 1986.
    HEALTH AND SAFETY LABORATORY An agency of the Health and Safety Executive
  31. PSLP Mod 1 1998, RISK ASSESSMENT AND HAZARD ANALYSIS, MSc in Process Safety and Loss prevention, Module 1, University of Sheffield, 1998.
  32. PSLP Mod 9 1998, COMPUTER CONTROL SAFE PRACTICES, MSc in Process Safety and Loss prevention, Module 9, University of Sheffield, 1998.
  33. Rasmussen 1997, HAZARD IDENTIFICATION BASED ON PLANT FUNCTIONAL MODELLING, B.Rasmussen, C.Whetton, Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, v55, p77-84, 1997.
  34. Reeves 1989, A DESCRIPTION OF GOFA, A.B.Reeves, G.L.Wells, D.A.Linkens, Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion 6, p28.1, 1989.
  35. Schlechter 1995, PROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT - USING SCIENCE TO “DO IT RIGHT”, W.Schlechter, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, v61, n2-3, p479-494, 1995.
  36. Socha 1996, USE OF VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT IN HAZARD ANALYSES, N.E.Socha, Professional Safety, v41, n9, p23-25, 1996.
  37. Stewart 1997, PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, M.G.Stewart, R.E.Melchers, Chapman and Hall, 1997.
  38. Swain 1983, HANDBOOK OF HUMAN-RELIABILTY ANALYSIS WITH EMPHASIS ON NUCLEAR PLANT APPLICATIONS, A.D.Swain, H.E.Guttman, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Report No. NUREG-CR-1278, 1983.
  39. Vesely 1981, FAULT TREE HANDBOOK, W.E.Vesely, F.F.Goldberg, N.H.Roberts, D.F.Haasl, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1981.
  40. Wells 1993, PRELIMINARY SAFETY ANALYSIS, G.Wells, M.Wardman, C.Whetton, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industry, v6, n1, p47-60, 1993.
  41. Wells 1996, HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, G.Wells, Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1996.
  42. Whetton 1993, SNEAK ANALYSIS OF PROCESS SYSTEMS, C.P.Whetton, Transactions of the Institute of Chemical Engineers, v71B, p169-179, 1993.
  43. Whetton 1994, SNEAK ANALYSIS OF BATCH PROCESSES, C.Whetton, W.Armstrong, Journal of Hazardous Materials, v38, p257-275, 1994.
  44. Williams 1971, SAFETY AUDITS, D.Williams, Major Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, The Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series No. 34, p220-242, 1971.
  45. Worsell 1994, THE APPLICATION OF RISK ASSESSMENT TO MACHINERY SAFETY, N.Worsell, J.Wilday, Health and Safety Executive, Report No. IR/L/RAM/94/02, 1994.

3

4. hazop and hazan

5

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATION
AFD approved for design
AIChE American Institution of Chemical Engineers
BS British Standard
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CHAZOP computer HAZOP (study)
CIA Chemical Industries Association
CPF central process facility
DHSV down hole safety valve
EC European Community
EPSC European Process Safety Centre
ESDV emergency shutdown valve
EU European Union
FEED front-end engineering design
FMEA failure modes and effects analysis
FMECA failure modes and effects criticality analysis
HAZID hazard identification (method)HAZOPhazard and operability (study)
HS hazard study
HSE Health and Safety Executive (UK)
IChemE Institution of Chemical EngineersIECInternational Electrotechnical Commission
I/O input/output
LOPA layer of protection analysis
LTEL long-term exposure limit
MOCmanagement of change (system)MSDSmaterial safety data sheetMVmaster valveOPorifice plateOSHAOffice of Safety and Health Administration (USA)P&IDpiping and instrumentation diagramPESprogrammable electronic systemPFDprobability of failure on demandPIproductivity indexPIFperformance-influencing factor
PSMprocess safety managementPSSRpre start-up safety reviewQAquality assuranceQRAquantitative risk assessment/analysisSHEsafety, health, and environmentalSILsafety integrity levelSISsafety instrumented systemSMSsafety management systemSOPstandard operating procedureSORsafety and operability reviewSSSVsub-surface safety valveWVwing valve152Acronyms and Abbreviations
Previous PDFNext PDF
Article info
Hide
Recommended Articles
Review Procedures
Dennis P. Nolan
Safety and Security Review for the Process Industries • 2015
PreviewView PDFSave PDF
Schedule and Cost Estimates
Dennis P. Nolan
Safety and Security Review for the Process Industries • 2015
PreviewView PDFSave PDF
Adaptation to Security Vulnerability Analysis
Dennis P. Nolan
Safety and Security Review for the Process Industries • 2015
PreviewView PDFSave PDF

reference

  1. Accrediation of university chemical engineering Cources, A guide for university departments, November, 1996, Appendix 1, paragraph 10.1 instituteion of chem ical engineers, Rugby, UK
  2. Anon, 1999, interactive training package no.934, Hazop and Hazan and Multi stage hazard Study, Institution of chemical Engineers, Rugby, UK

Reference chapter 1.

その他の資料

HAZOP : Guidelines to best Practice for the process and chemical industries （2ND）
https://www.kinokuniya.co.jp/f/dsg-02-9780852955253
FC0852955251.jpg

平成 26 年度 経済産業省委託 高圧ガス取扱施設におけるリスクアセスメント手法及び保安教育プログラム調査研究 報告書 平成 27 年 3 月 高圧ガス保安協会
https://www.meti.go.jp/meti_lib/report/2015fy/000062.pdf

HAZOP on IPA web • 

•  重要インフラの制御システムセキュリティとITサービス継続に関する調査（付録）, p.27, 2009年3月, https://www.ipa.go.jp/files/000025097.pdf

HAZOP(Hazard And Operability Study):危険シナリオ 分析手法の一つで、化学プロセス における複数の 独立した事象が複雑に絡む故障を取り扱うために開発された手法。

https://www.ipa.go.jp/files/000013983.pdf 2017/12/28

slideshare

slideshare @kaizen_nagoya (kaizenjapan)

Hazop tokyo201809

  1. HAZOP 質疑応答編&記録編(3.6a) Safety and Security 2018/09/28 石津和紀と愉快な仲間たち
 株式会社 アイ・シー・エス　石津和紀 株式会社デンソークリエイト 柏原一雄 株式会社エー・アンド・ディ　佐藤克 名古屋市工業研究所 小川清
    https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-tokyo201809

Privacy SettingsAnalytics FREE
High Quality Design with Hcd and hazop
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/high-quality-design-with-hcd-and-hazop

Hazop Safety and Security at Fukui 2017(1/2)
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-safety-and-security-at-fukui-201712

Hazop Safety and Security at Fukui 2017(2/2)
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-safety-and-security-at-fukui-201722

Hazop and triz by/of/for the children(1/3)
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-and-triz-byoffor-the-children13

Hazop and triz by/of/for the children(2/3)
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-and-triz-byoffor-the-children23

Hazop and triz by/of/for the children(3/3)
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-and-triz-byoffor-the-children33

EditPrivacy SettingsAnalytics FREE
STAMP/STPA and UML/HAZOP on the IoT and AI/Deep Learning
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/stampstpa-and-umlhazop-on-the-iot-and-aideep-learning

Hint of combination of Safety Analysis method (stamp/stpa and haze)
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hint-of-combination-of-safety-analysis-method-stampstpa-and-haze

Integral Operation on Safety and Security Analysis using Hazop with other Analysis method including FTA, FMEA, STAMP/STPA, FRAM and other method
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/integral-operation-on-safety-and-security-analysis-using-hazop-with-other-analysis-method-including-fta-fmea-stampstpa-fram-and-other-method-80796513

Hazop as Safety and Security at a Factory, Sep 11, 2017
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-as-safety-and-security-at-a-factory

Hazop and other analysis method include STAMP and FRAM
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-and-othere-analysis-method-include-stamp-and-fram

Google BGP update with Hazop, Aug 31, 2017
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/google-bgp-update-with-hazop

HAZOP, Safety and Security with records, SWEST at Gero Gifu pref. Japan
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-safety-and-security-with-records-swest-at-gero-gifu-pref-japan

Road Traffic Safety Analysis with HAZOP and TRIZ
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/road-traffic-safety-analysis-with-hazop-and-triz

はぞっぷとりーずあんぜんぶんせき(1/2)
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/12-76145295

はぞっぷとりーずあんぜんぶんせき(2/2)
https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/22-76145311

交通事故死を減らすのにプログラマが主導できる事項13選。仮説・検証（21）。安全(26)

ちょけねこ　たんじょうびのおくりもの　

ちょけ3.jpg

プログラムの仕様・設計で抜け漏れがないかを確かめるために使うことができる道具の説明絵本です。

誰もがわかるように、楽しいことで説明しています。
特に、１０歳以下の子供が取り組むときには、必ず楽しいことで演習をしてください。

最後に、直接プログラムで判定できるように式を記述しています。プログラムを組む時の条件分岐にご利用ください。

まほうのことば11(11 guide words)

魔法の言葉２.png

プログラミング的例を掲載しています。

無(no)
if ( 0 == x || NULL == x) {
 exception(x)
} else {
 function(x)
}
立場の違いによって見えるものが違う（Difference in appearance due to differences in viewpoint）

立場１（左）から見ると、全体はAで、色は黄色（薄い色）、Bは中心の部分で色は黄緑（濃い色）
立場２（右）から見ると、全体はBで、色は空色（やや薄い色）、Aは中心部分で色は黄緑色（濃い色）

立場が違えば、集合関係も違うように見えるかもしれないし、色も違うように見えるかもしれない。

視点の違い.png

HAZOP 質疑応答編&記録編(3.6a) Safety and Security

https://www.slideshare.net/kaizenjapan/hazop-tokyo201809 p.174

　この資料は、三次元のA、Bを二次元表記したものです。全体像は、横から、左下は左から、右下は右から見た像の二次元表記です。屈折率等を考慮すると、下の左右の中心像はもっと大きくなるというご指摘をいただいています。三次元描画ソフトでこの資料を作成してくださる方を募集しています。

文書履歴(document history)

ver. 0.01 初稿 20201122
ver. 0.04 URL追記　20230307

最後までおよみいただきありがとうございました。

いいね　💚、フォローをお願いします。

Thank you very much for reading to the last sentence.

Please press the like icon 💚　and follow me for your happy life.

2
1
0

Register as a new user and use Qiita more conveniently

  1. You get articles that match your needs
  2. You can efficiently read back useful information
  3. You can use dark theme
What you can do with signing up
Sign upLogin
2
1