@Keploy

Are you sure you want to delete the question?

If your question is resolved, you may close it.

Leaving a resolved question undeleted may help others!

We hope you find it useful!

What is End-to-End Testing and When Should It Be Used Instead of Integration Testing?

I often see terms like unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing used together in modern software projects. While unit and integration tests seem straightforward, I am confused about what exactly end-to-end testing covers and when it should be used instead of (or in addition to) integration testing.

Specifically:

What is the main purpose of end-to-end testing?

How is it different from integration testing in real-world projects?

When does adding E2E tests make sense, and when can they be avoided?

Are there any drawbacks or challenges of relying too much on E2E testing?

I would appreciate a practical explanation with examples from real applications (such as web or API-based systems), especially in CI/CD environments.

0 likes

1Answer

​In modern development, E2E testing is essentially the "Evolution of System Testing" adapted for Agile and CI/CD environments. Here is a practical breakdown to address your confusion:
​1. What is the main purpose?
​The goal is to verify the User Experience (UX) rather than individual functions. It ensures that the "Happy Path" (e.g., Search → Add to Cart → Checkout) works seamlessly across the entire stack, including the frontend, backend, database, and 3rd-party integrations.
​2. E2E vs. Integration Testing
​Integration Testing: Validates that two or more modules (e.g., API and DB) talk to each other correctly. It’s fast and runs in a "headless" or internal environment.
​E2E Testing: Validates the system from the user's perspective (usually via a browser). It’s a "black-box" test that covers the flow from "End to End."
​3. When to use it (and when to avoid it)
​Use it for: Critical business flows where failure means a direct loss of revenue (e.g., Login, Payment). These act as a safety net before deployment to prevent regressions.
​Avoid it for: Testing every single edge case or validation logic. E2E tests are "expensive" in terms of execution time and maintenance. Use Unit/Integration tests for granular logic.
​4. The Challenges (The "Dark Side" of E2E)
​Flakiness: E2E tests often fail due to network lag or minor UI changes rather than actual bugs.
​Execution Time: Running a full suite can take hours, which slows down your CI/CD pipeline.
​Missing Non-functional Requirements: While E2E focuses on the "flow," it might overlook security, performance, or stress testing—areas that a traditional "System Test" would typically cover.
​Summary
​Think of E2E testing as a high-level safeguard for user stories. It’s the modern replacement for traditional System Testing in Agile, but it should be used selectively (following the Test Pyramid) to keep your CI/CD pipeline fast and reliable.

0Like

Your answer might help someone💌