R3 on "What are the most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years? " Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari(13)

R3(References on References on References) on "What are the most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years? " Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari(13)

R3 on "What are the most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years? " Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari(0)
https://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/a8eac9afbf16d2188901

What are the most important statistical ideas of the past 50 years?
Andrew Gelman, Aki Vehtari
https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00174

References

13

Bland, J. M., and Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327, 307–310.

References on 13

13.1

1- Battagel JMA. Comparative assessment of cephalometric errors.
Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:305-14.

Reference on 13.1

13.1.1

The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements.
W. Houston
Medicine
American journal of orthodontics
1983
The sources of error in cephalometric measurement and their analyses are discussed. The importance of distinguishing bias and random errors is emphasized, and methods of control are discussed.… Expand
1,526

###13.1.2
Reproducibility of Cephalometric Measurements
P. J. Sandler
Medicine
British journal of orthodontics
1988
TLDR
Of the three methods direct digitization of the radiographs proved to be the most reproducible particularly with angular measurements, although statistically significant differences were rarely found.

###13.1.3
Repeated measures analysis of geometrically constructed and directly determined cephalometric points.
A. W. Savage, K. Showfety, J. Yancey
Mathematics, Medicine
American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
1987
TLDR
The level of observer experience and quality of radiograph were statistically unrelated to landmark variability on replicate examination, and the geometrically constructed landmarks tested were not statistically different from the reliability of the directly determined bony-based landmarks. Expand
###13.1.4
Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs.
W. Houston, R. E. Maher, D. McElroy, M. Sherriff
Medicine
European journal of orthodontics
1986
Radiographic and tracing errors in cephalometric measurements were studied using a nested analysis of variance on tracings of duplicate cephalometric radiographs of 24 subjects. Tracing errors… Expand
###13.1.5
Effect of Patient Repositioning on Cephalometric Measurements
P. J. Sandler
Medicine
British journal of orthodontics
1988
The purpose of this study was to assess the contribution to tracing error of positioning the patient within the cephalostat. It was carried out by comparing the differences between repeated… Expand

###13.1.6
A statistical evaluation of cephalometric prediction.
L. Johnston
Medicine
The Angle orthodontist
1968
TLDR
This paper presents a poster presented at the Conference on Cranio-Facial Growth, Ann Arbor, May, 1967, where it was presented as a monograph on cranio-facial growth and its applications in dentistry. Expand

###13.1.7
Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances.
J. Midtgard, G. Björk, S. Linder-Aronson
Medicine
The Angle orthodontist
1974
TLDR
This work presents a new mesodontic model that combines a probabilistic approach to assess the role of canine coronavirus and its role in the development of enamel replacement during the teenage years. Expand

###13.1.8
Functional Orthodontic Appliances
K. Isaacson, R. T. Reed, C. Stephens
Engineering
1991
The relevance of growth mode of action cephalometrics case selection and appliance management the appliances combination treatment and extractions the limitations of research. Appendices: resume of… Expand
###13.1.9
Functional orthodontic appliances.
N. D. Di Salvo
Medicine
The New York state dental journal
1982

###13.1.10
Statistical methods
W. R. Buckland, G. W. Snedecor, W. Cochran
Psychology
1980

###13.1.11
An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis.
A. Richardson
Medicine
American journal of orthodontics
1966

13.2

2- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing
agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet.
1986;8:307-10.

13.3

3- Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological
students. 2nd ed. New York: Interscience Publications; 1946.

13.4

4- Houston WJ, Maher RE, McElroy D, Sherriff M. Sources of error
in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod.
1986.8:149-51.

13.5

5- Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic
measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;5:382-90.

13.6

6- Martelli JA Filho, Maltagliati LA, Trevisan F, Gil CTLA. New
statistical methods to evaluate reproducibility. Rev Dent Press
Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2005;10:122-9.

13.7

7- Midtgård J, Björk G, Linder-Aronson S. Reproducibility
of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of
cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthod. 1974;44:56-61.

13.8

8- Silveira HL, Silveira HE. Reproducibility of cephalometric
measures made by three radiology clinics. Angle Orthod.
2006;76:394-9

参考資料(References)

Data Scientist の基礎(2)
https://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/8b2f27353a9980bf445c

岩波数学辞典　二つの版がCDに入ってお得
https://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/1210940fe2121423d777

岩波数学辞典
https://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/b37bfd303658cb5ee11e

アンの部屋（人名から学ぶ数学：岩波数学辞典）英語(24)
https://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/e02cbe23b96d5fb96aa1

＜この記事は個人の過去の経験に基づく個人の感想です。現在所属する組織、業務とは関係がありません。＞

最後までおよみいただきありがとうございました。

いいね　💚、フォローをお願いします。

Thank you very much for reading to the last sentence.

Please press the like icon 💚　and follow me for your happy life.