Help us understand the problem. What is going on with this article?

Ruby向けAutopagerizeをMechanizeで使えるようにした

More than 5 years have passed since last update.

autopagerize-rubのclientをMechanizeにしてみた。
ソースはこちら。
https://github.com/chezou/autopagerize-ruby/tree/mechanized

ぶっちゃけ、httpclientの方が軽くて高速だとは思うけど、robots.txtやその周りのMeta-tagをハンドリングするのにはMechanizeの方が良いと思ってやった。

少し気になるのが、gemspecのauthor周り。
人のコードをforkしたときに、gemspecってどうやって書けばいいのだろう?今回は特にオリジナルとは別路線でいくコードだし。
まぁ、Treasuredataのtd-logger-rubyでもオリジナルのgemspecのままっぽいしいいか。

エラーハンドリングとかは結構適当かもしれません。

こんな適当な投稿がQiita初投稿とは、、、。
半端にrobots.txtを守らないといけない企業の方とか使ってください。

Why not register and get more from Qiita?
  1. We will deliver articles that match you
    By following users and tags, you can catch up information on technical fields that you are interested in as a whole
  2. you can read useful information later efficiently
    By "stocking" the articles you like, you can search right away
Comments
No comments
Sign up for free and join this conversation.
If you already have a Qiita account
Why do not you register as a user and use Qiita more conveniently?
You need to log in to use this function. Qiita can be used more conveniently after logging in.
You seem to be reading articles frequently this month. Qiita can be used more conveniently after logging in.
  1. We will deliver articles that match you
    By following users and tags, you can catch up information on technical fields that you are interested in as a whole
  2. you can read useful information later efficiently
    By "stocking" the articles you like, you can search right away
ユーザーは見つかりませんでした