JAVAの標準化、著作権に関する資料を記録する。
<この項は書きかけです。順次追記します。>
意外と若い、プログラム言語の誕生日と年齢。
https://qiita.com/Nekonecode/items/841c9dda9ba1a3014635
今まで吸っていた空気を突然有料化されるような気分である。
JAVAはISO/IEC JTC1規格、ECMA規格にならなかった。
JAVAは空気のようではなかったことの確認。
JAVAがISO/IEC JTC1規格にならなかった1997-1998年に比べて、
PHP, Pythonができたのはもっと前。JAVAの非公開性と無関係。
文献1
JavaTM Standardization A White Paper, Ken Urquhart, JavaSoft,
2550 Garcia Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043 U.S.A. 408-343-1400, April 1997
ftp://ftp.icm.edu.pl/packages/javasoft-docs/papers/javastd.pdf
文献2
標準情報 TR X 0005-1998 Java言語規定 解説
http://www.y-adagio.com/public/standards/tr_javalang/javatut.htm
文献3
JSG - Java Study Group
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/JSG/
文献4
ISO Java Standardization Profile
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/JSG/docs/m3/docs/jsgn3-6.htm
文献5
JTC1/SC22 N2531 Mon, 28 Jul 1997
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/open/n2531.htm
文献6
TC1/SC22 N2574 Thu, 28 Aug 1997
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/open/n2574.htm
文献7
ISO/IEC JTC1 / SC22 / JSG
Date: 1998-10-26 / 1998-10-27, Java Study Group
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/JSG/docs/m3/recs3.htm
文献8
Why JavaTM Was - Not - Standardized Twice, Tineke M. Egyedi
Copyright 2001 IEEE. Published in the Proceedings of the Hawai'i International Conference On System Sciences, January 3-6, 2001, Maui, Hawaii.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3f9a/6679a28be37fe1c9e2e9272524bb8b24b988.pdf
References
[1] M.B.H. Weiss & M. Sirbu, "Technological choice in voluntary standards committees: an empirical analysis", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1, 1990, pp.111-133.
[2] P. Grindley, Standards, Strategy and Policy: Cases and Stories, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
[3] C.F. Cargill, Information Technology Standardization. Theory, Process and Organizations. Digital Press, Digital Equipment Corporation, 1989.
[4] M.J. Bonino & M.B. Spring, "Standards as change agents in the information technology market", Computer Standards & Interfaces, 12, 1991, pp.97-107.
[5] P.A. David & S. Greenstein, "The economics of compatibility standards: an introduction to recent research", Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, Vol. 1, 1990, pp.3-41.
[6] H. de Vries, "Formele ICT-normalisatie: passe?", I&I, 17, 1999, pp. 28-35.
[7] S.K. Schmidt & R. Werle, Coordinating Technology. Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunications, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1998.
[8] J. Farrell & G. Saloner, "Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements and predation" American Economic Review, 76, 1986, pp.940-955.
[9] F. Vercoulen & M. van Wegberg, "Het spel van samenwerking en concurrentie: Hybride standaard- selectieprocessen in de ICT sector", I&I, 17, 1999, pp. 19-27. [10] T.M. Egyedi, Compatibility strategies in licensing, open source software and formal standards: Externalities of Java 'standardization', Contribution to 5th Helsinki Workshop on Standardization and Networks, 13-14 August 2000.
[11] Sun, Amended Complaint, October 14, 1997.
[12] R.P. Gabriel and W.N. Joy, Sun Community Source License' Principles (SCSL), 1998.
[13] Sun, The Java Community Process (sm) Program Manual: The formal procedures for using Java Specification development process (version 1.0, December 1998).
[14] E.R. Harold, The Java Gated Community Process, 1999, [http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/editorials/jcp.html].
[15] M. Vizard, "Java Lobby president calls for reform", InfoWorld Electric, November 19, 1998. [www.infoworld.com] [16] S. Shankland, "Sun offers olive branch to Java partners", CNET News.com, March 1, 2000.
[17] Sun, The Java Community Process (sm) Program Manual: The formal procedures for using Java Specification development process, version 2.0, review draft, April 2000. [18] Ch. Babcock, "Java: Can Sun control the flood", Inter@ctive Week, June 12, 2000, [www.zdnet.com].
[19] ISO/IEC JTC1, The Transposition of Publicly Available Specifications into International Standards - A Management Guide -Revision 1 of JTC 1 N 3582, N 5746, January 1999. [20] ISO/IEC JTC1, JTC1 Directives, 1999.
[21] T.M. Egyedi, Grey fora of standardization: a comparison of JTC 1 and Internet. KPN, KPN Research, Leidschendam. R&D-RA-94-1235, 1994.
[22] T. Clark, "Java standard voted down--for now", CNET News.com, July 30, 1997.
[23] Sun, Sun response to ISO/IEC JTC1 N4811 and N4833, 1997 [www.Sun.com].
[24] ISO/IEC JTC1, N5090, November 1997.
[25] "Sun's ISO application progresses", July 16 1997 [www.sun.com].
[26] N. Brookes, "Has Sun gone off on one?", contribution to a discussion on JavaLobby Pro-Sun or Pro-Java?, 26 January 2000.
[27] Sun press conference, Question and Answering session, November 1997, [www.sun.com].
[28] United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation. Findings of Fact, United States District Court For The District Of Columbia, Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ), 1999.
[29] ISO/IEC JTC1, PAS Transposition: JTC 1 finishes trial, improves its guidelines and moves to regular operation, 1999- 9-8.
[30] JTC 1 Chairman's Comments on Recent Press Articles Regarding Sun Microsystems' PAS Submitter Status, 1999-5-1, [www.jtc1.org].
[31] S. Shankland, "Sun revising plan for Java recognition", CNET News.com, April 29, 1999; 'Sun seeks control of Java process', CNET News.com, May 6, 1999, [www.znet.com].
[32] E.D. Jensen, Real-Time Java Status Report, Revised Draft, January 24, 1999, [http://www.real-time.org/].
[33] S. Shankland, "Sun renews Java standards effort", CNET News.com, May 5, 1999.
[34] ECMA, Minutes of the 1st meeting of ECMA TC41 held in Menlo Park (USA) on 25th - 26th October 1999, ECMA/TC41/99/16, 1999.
[35] J.C. Perez, "Sun changes strategy for Java's ISO approval", IDG News Service, May 6, 1999.
[36] C. Sliwa, "Java standard switch: Will new process ease cross-platform compatibility?", Computerworld, May 7, 1999. [37] Sun press release, December 7, 1999.
[38] ECMA CC 11-12 November 1999.
[39] ECMA, Minutes of the meeting of the coordinating Committee held in Geneva on 11th - 12th November 1999, ECMA/GA/99/127.
[40] The EICTA position paper is referred to in CSN 337-03 Sun's Up To Something.
[41] Software Technology Embedded in or Becoming a Standard, ICTSB18 (00) 22, discussion paper.
[42] Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft Corporation, United States District Court For The Northern District Of California, January 24, 2000, No. C 97-20884 Rmw (Pvt), Order Re Sun's Motion To Reinstate November 17, 1998 Preliminary Injunction Under 17 U.S.C. § 502; Preliminary Injunction Under Cal.Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 Et Seq.
[43] J. Niccolai & L. Rohde, "Sun confers with licensees over control of Java", IDG News service, 3/3/2000.
＜この記事は個人の過去の経験に基づく個人の感想です。現在所属する組織、業務とは関係がありません。＞
文書履歴(documenthttps://qiita.com/kaizen_nagoya/items/d6d5d2094c6690b82ab9 history)
ver. 0.01 初稿 20100514
最後までおよみいただきありがとうございました。
いいね 💚、フォローをお願いします。
Thank you very much for reading to the last sentence.
Please press the like icon 💚 and follow me for your happy life.