End-to-End Delay Minimization for Scientific Workflows in Clouds under Budget Constraint

End-to-End Delay Minimization for Scientific Workflows in Clouds under Budget Constraint
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6898826/references#references

Reference

1. Amazon EC2 [Online]. Available: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/, 2014.
2. Pegasus in the cloud [Online]. Available: http://pegasus.isi.edu/cloud, 2014.
3. The Django framework [Online]. Available: http://www.djangoproject.com, 2014.
4. WebGL [Online]. Available: http://get.webgl.org, 2014.
5. [Online]. Available: http://www.wrf-model.org/index.php, 2014.
6. WRF Preprocessing System (WPS) [Online]. Available: http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/wpsv2/wps.html, 2013.
7. Nimbus cloud project [Online]. Available: http://www.nimbusproject.org, 2014.
8. S. Abrishami and M. Naghibzadeh, “Deadline-constrained workflow scheduling in software as a service cloud,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 19, pp. 680–689, 2012.
9. H. Arabnejad and J.G. Barbosa, “A budget constrained scheduling algorithm for workflow applications,” J. Grid Comput., pp. 1–15, 2014.
10. R. Bajaj and D. Agrawal, “Improving scheduling of tasks in a heterogeneous environment,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 107–118, Feb. 2004.
11. P. Barham, B. Dragovic, K. Fraser, S. Hand, T. Harris, A. Ho, R. Neugebauer, I. Pratt, and A. Warfield, “Xen and the art of virtualization, ” ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., vol. 37, pp. 164–177, 2003.
12. R. N. Calheiros, R. Ranjan, A. Beloglazov, C. De Rose, and R. Buyya, “Cloudsim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms, ” Softw.: Practice Exp., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23–50, 2011.
13. Cascading, “Cascading: An application framework for developing robust data analytics and data management application on cloud computing cluster. http://www.cascading.org, 2012.
14. W. Chen and E. Deelman, “Integration of workflow partitioning and resource provisioning,” in Proc. 12th IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. Cluster, Cloud Grid Comput., 2012, pp. 764–768.
15. E. Deelman, G. Singh, M. Livny, B. Berriman, and J. Good, “The cost of doing science on the cloud: The montage example,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE Conf. Supercomput., 2008, pp. 1–12.
16. M. R. Garey, and D. S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-completeness. San Francisco, CA, USA : Freeman, 1979.
17. J. Goecks, A. Nekrutenko, J. Taylor, and The Galaxy Team, “Galaxy: A comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences, ” Genome Biol, vol. 11, no. 8, p. R86, 2010.
18. Y. Gu and Q. Wu, “Optimizing distributed computing workflows in heterogeneous network environments, ” in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Netw., Jan. 2010, pp. 142–154.
19. Y. Gu, Q. Wu, and N.S.V. Rao, “Analyzing execution dynamics of scientific workflows for latency minimization in resource sharing environments, ” in Proc. 7th IEEE World Congr. Service, Jul. 2011, pp. 153–160.
20. T. Hacker and K. Mahadik, “Flexible resource allocation for reliable virtual cluster computing systems,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE Supercomput. Conf., 2011, pp. 48:1–48:12.
21. C. Hoffa, G. Mehta, T. Freeman, E. Deelman, K. Keahey, B. Berriman, and J. Good, “On the use of cloud computing for scientific workflows,” in Proc. 4th IEEE Int. Conf. eSci., 2008, pp. 640–645.
22. D. Hull, K. Wolstencroft, R. Stevens, C. Goble, M. Pocock, P. Li, and T. Oinn. (2006). Taverna: A tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Res. [Online]. 34, pp. 729–732. Available: http://www.taverna.org.uk
23. J. Y. Jung and J. Bae, “Workflow clustering method based on process similarity, ” in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Its Appl., vol. 2, pp. 379–389, 2006.
24. G. Juve, E. Deelman, K. Vahi, G. Mehta, B. Berriman, B. Berman, and P. Maechling, “Data sharing options for scientific workflows on amazon EC2,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. High Perform. Comput., Netw., Storage Anal., 2010, pp. 1–9.
25. X. Lin and C. Q. Wu, “On scientific workflow scheduling in clouds under budget constraint, ” in Proc. 42nd Int. Conf. Parallel Process., Lyon, France, Oct. 2013, pp. 90–99.
26. M. Mao and M. Humphrey, “Auto-scaling to minimize cost and meet application deadlines in cloud workflows,” in Proc. Int. Conf. High Perform. Comput., Netw., Storage Anal., 2011, pp. 49:1–49:12.
27. M. Mao, J. Li, and H. Marty, “Cloud auto-scaling with deadline and budget constraints,” in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Grid Comput., Oct. 2010, pp. 41–48.
28. S. Martello, and P. Toth, Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implementations. Hoboken, NJ, USA : Wiley, 1990.
29. C. Olston, G. Chiou, L. Chitnis, F. Liu, Y. Han, M. Larsson, A. Neumann, V. B. N. Rao, V. Sankarasubramanian, S. Seth, C. Tian, T. ZiCornell, and X. Wang, “Nova: Continuous Pig/Hadoop workflows, ” in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Manage. Data, 2011, pp. 1081–1090.
30. Apache Oozie, “Oozie: A workflow/coordination system to manage computing jobs,” http://incubator.apache.org/oozie, 2012.