Help us understand the problem. What is going on with this article?

ActiveJobでのRSpec

More than 3 years have passed since last update.

どうしたもんやらと悩んでいたんだけど have_enqueued_job matcher ってのがあった!
これで勝つるっ!

簡単な使い方(enqueueされたかどうかだけを確認したい時)

RSpec.describe TestScheduleJob do
  ActiveJob::Base.queue_adapter = :test
  it {
    expect {
      TestScheduleJob.perform_later
    }.to have_enqueued_job(TestJob)
  }
end

enqueueされた件数をテストしたい時

RSpec.describe TestScheduleJob do
  ActiveJob::Base.queue_adapter = :test
  it {
    expect {
      TestScheduleJob.perform_later
    }.to have_enqueued_job(TestJob).exactly(1)
  }
end

exactly には数字が入ったり :once やら twice が入ったりするらしい。けど、日本人的には数字が入ってる方がわかりやすい気がする。まぁ、そこはお好みで。
(once, twice の次ってなんだっけ?ってので悩むぐらいなら...みたいな

exactly 以外にも、最低でもx件とか最高でもx件の時は at_least とか at_most でいけるっぽい

Why not register and get more from Qiita?
  1. We will deliver articles that match you
    By following users and tags, you can catch up information on technical fields that you are interested in as a whole
  2. you can read useful information later efficiently
    By "stocking" the articles you like, you can search right away
Comments
No comments
Sign up for free and join this conversation.
If you already have a Qiita account
Why do not you register as a user and use Qiita more conveniently?
You need to log in to use this function. Qiita can be used more conveniently after logging in.
You seem to be reading articles frequently this month. Qiita can be used more conveniently after logging in.
  1. We will deliver articles that match you
    By following users and tags, you can catch up information on technical fields that you are interested in as a whole
  2. you can read useful information later efficiently
    By "stocking" the articles you like, you can search right away
ユーザーは見つかりませんでした