Typically, approaches to represent parameterized paths in the type level have required making some kind of type-level operator of kind Type -> Type -> Type, so that you could define routes in a manner such as type MyRoute = Literal "hello" / Param "name". While this seems "explicit", it also seems at least a little bit silly: why can't we use Symbols to define these routes?
Csongor wrote about how Symbol.Cons was implemented for PureScript, with an example library for deriving variadic functions here: http://kcsongor.github.io/purescript-safe-printf/. He also then made a record-based formatting library here: https://github.com/kcsongor/purescript-record-format. Surely we can take advantage of these to make a type-level path solution?
"Well-typed path params in PureScript 0.12"
In this post, I talked about how we can use the type-level parsing result from record-format to make a path:
Knowing that we are going to parse URLs, we can use / as delimiters, where we can match literal and variable sections. In building up the variable results, we can use Record.Builder to build up a record of the parameters we have parsed into a record of strings, where the key is the name that we gave our parameter in this scheme:
url :: SProxy "/hello/{name}/{age}"
In the future, we'll talk about how we can add optional type annotations to this Symbol, so that we don't need to work with a record of strings being converted by key to a proper heterogeneous record.